In Afghanistan, the U.S. and Iran share a common enemy - the Taliban - and a history of productive military, strategic and diplomatic cooperation to topple the Taliban and fight al-Qaeda. That collaboration came to an end after the Bush administration labeled Iran a member of the "axis of evil" and rebuffed Iranian overtures.
In the coming months, Afghanistan will again be at a political crossroads. The U.S. would benefit from engaging Iran as a regional ally in support of political stability, secure borders, economic development and anti-drug measures in Afghanistan. History suggests Iran can still be a willing and useful partner - if the overall relationship can be improved.
Key Points
The U.S. and Iran have a remarkable and little-known history of productive cooperation in Afghanistan
Though most Americans aren't aware of it, Iran has been a critical ally in America's fight against the Taliban in the past. Afther 9/11, Iran and America fought the Taliban together. Iran's Revolutionary Guard supplied and funded U.S.-supported commanders of the Northern Alliance.
After the Taliban was toppled, the United States and Iran worked together to form the new Afghan government. Iran contributed $750 million to reconstruction -- a huge sum for Iran -- and even offered to work under U.S. command to help rebuild the Afghan National Army.1
But when Iran sought to turn this collaboration into an opportunity for broader dialog with the United States, it was rebuffed.
As Ambassador James Dobbins reports, shortly after the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan, senior Iranian officials expressed interest in opening a broader dialog with the United States for the purpose of improving the bilateral relationship. Their overture was ignored, and Iran was called, instead, part of an "axis of evil" -- along with two other countries with which Iran had no relations or hostile relations.
In just two short years, productive cooperation deteriorated into mutual suspicion and dangerous hostility. The Obama administration has an opportunity to reverse course-and to better protect American interests and security by doing so.
The U.S. and Iran still share common goals in Afghanistan. History shows that Iran can help the U.S. succeed in Afghanistan - or it can make America's task there even harder.
Despite the deterioration in U.S.-Iran relations since 2002, the United States and Iran still share interests in Afghanistan. Both countries oppose the Taliban and al Qaeda and would like to see them gone. Both want a strong and stable Afghan state that is able to control the movement of guns and weapons. Neither country wants an Afghanistan that sends hordes of refugees seeking safety in other countries. An objective basis for cooperation exists.3
Recommendation
Our troops are fighting a very difficult war in a desolate and remote region. They need all the help they can get. Despite huge differences on many other issues, Afghanistan is one area where the United States and Iran have common interests, have worked together productively in the past, and should be able to do so again. The United States should seek to restore a productive working relationship with Iran in confronting the Taliban threat in Afghanistan.
Footnotes
1. James Dobbins, “Negotiating with Iran: Testimony by James Dobbins before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs,” November 7, 2007. [back] 2. In October 2007, the Treasury Dept. formally sanctioned Qods for arranging "frequent shipments of small arms and associated ammunition, rocket propelled grenades, mortar rounds, 107mm rockets, plastic explosives, and probably man-portable defense systems to the Taliban." U.S. Department of Treasury, “Fact Sheet: Designation of Iranian Entities and Individuals for Proliferation Activities and Support for Terrorism,” October 25, 2007. [back] 3. For an excellent analysis of Iran's role in Afghanistan by one of the world's leading authorities, see Barnett Rubin, US Iran Policy and Afghanistan: Alternative Approaches (2008). [back]
This site reflects the input of a large group of experts with diverse knowledge, experience and affiliations. The views expressed on this site do not reflect the position of any organization with which these experts may be affiliated. Nor do they necessarily reflect the position of all group members. While all members strongly support the general policy thrust and judgments reflected on this site, they may not necessarily all concur with every specific assertion or recommendation contained therein.